Mark 16:18
they will pick up snakes in their hands, and if they drink any deadly thing, it will not hurt them; they will lay their hands on the sick, and they will recover.
OK, a few conservatives and fundamentalists believe this, but not many.
From Arguing With God: A Jewish Tradition, by Anson Laytner
the tradition of arguing with God speaks to my deepest needs and concerns. This tradition asks the right questions of God: its prayers demand all the right things of God. Most of the time, for example, I cannot recite the prayer ‘Mi Kahamokha’ (‘Who is Life You?’), which celebrates God’s redemptive act at the Sea of Reeds, without asking what God has been doing since that miraculous day. But, through study, I know that previous generations have asked the same questions. They ask it for me as well, and this comforts me. On most occasions, I cannot recite the petitionary prayers of the Amidah. (Perhaps it is first recited silently to allow for conscientious objectors?) How can I ask God for ‘small items’ like understanding, sustenance, health, forgiveness, and peace when for centuries the petitions for the ‘big item,’ for redemption, have gone unheeded? Although I often can still thank God for the gifts of Creation, the gifts of life, and the gift of the Covenant, most of the time I cannot think to ask anything of God other than to add my voice to the ages-old petition for justice. The tradition of arguing with God focuses my intention (kavanah) on this fundamental issue. It is hoped that it focuses God’s attention on it as well. But regardless, it helps ease my spiritual pain. Knowing that previous generations have felt similarly both confirms the intensity of my yearnings for God’s appearance, which constitute my mystic aspect, and also soothes the uniqueness of my equally intense doubts, which constitute my agnostic side. It is good to know that I belong to a chain of tradition, that my feelings are not an aberration of the Jewish religious spirit. (p. 234)
Today’s Wedgewood lunch meeting is at Lupies, a Charlotte landmark and tradition. It’s one of those hole in the wall joints. Nothing fancy, but good food. And the owner is a very good person. She’s been very generous to worthy causes in Charlotte.
Personally, I am surprised Lupie’s owner has not been sued. Her chili will “kill you.” I confess that I’m a chili wimp, but even taking that into account, her chili will kill you.
Jose Garica, a dear Wedgewoodian, who died several years ago – well, let me stop there for a second. Jose was a dear, but he was as much of a pain in the butt as he was a dear. He was both extremes. You loved him and you wanted to strangle him. Now that I’ve gotten that straight I’ll proceed.
Jose was one of the people who loved watching me suffer as I put spoon after spoon of Lupie’s chili into my mouth headed for my digestive system. No preacher exaggeration here. I suffered. And not only for one day, but two days.
Jose, who proudly and frequently told everybody “I am a queen, not a mind reader,” grinned from ear to ear as he saw my great discomfort, sweat beading off the top of my head, saw my gut wrench in agony.
And then he told me something he could have told me before I placed my order. He said, “Food should not hurt. Next time ask them to mix a half order of sweet Cincinnati Chili with a half order of the Fire Alarm Chili.”
“I’ll do that, Jose. If I live to place another order.”
I’m still missing Jose. His black beans loaded with garlic gave me bad breath for a month. My wife loved his Flan. He loved to take my wife on shopping trips. There was never a dull moment if Jose was near.
Rest in peace, Jose. Rest in peace. Be careful about that chili in heaven.
I permit no woman to teach or to have authority over a man; she is to keep silent.
Ironically, more than a few fundamentalist women have emailed me or called me teaching me what I don’t know about the Bible. Evidently, they haven’t read 1 Timothy 2:12. Or maybe they have and choose to ignore it.
I don’t particularly care for Southern heritage. I, in fact, am ashamed of much of my Southern heritage. I do, however, treasure and enjoy Southern hospitality.
Southern hospitality takes many forms: opening your home to out of town visitors, fixing plenty of food at meals, taking your hat off when you are indoors, providing funeral food for the bereaved, treating strangers like you’ve known them all your life, holding doors open for the ladies and seniors, saying “yes, sir” and “no, mam,” and telling guests at the end of their visit “Ya’ll come back now.”
As it turns out, Southern fundamentalist Christians also practice Southern hospitality when they condemn others for the errors of their ways. I am the Pastor as a church which has worked to defeat GLBT discrimination. Many Southerners think homosexuality is an abomination. They have Bible verses to back them up so they feel confident in telling Satan-possessed people like me that we are going to burn in a fire unless we change our ways. Only Southerners could make the delivery of such religious denunciation so politely.
I get lots of letters and phone messages from fundamentalist Christians warning me about what will be, in their opinion, a disastrous end to my life. I’ve been sent to hell so many times it no longer bothers me. I’m starting to even enjoy it, particularly the ones done so politely, with such Southern hospitality. For example, one lady wrote a two page letter, filling it with a lot of Bible verses. Her final words were: you are going to hell. Signed by “your friend in Christ.” With friends like you, I don’t need friends.
Another lady, in response to Wedgewood Church putting “Vote Against Amendment One” on our church sign left a message on the church answering machine. She ranted and raved about me and the church for five minutes. Then she caught her breath and said, “Thank you for listening.”
Southern hospitality – don’t you just love it?
Ya’ll come back now.
In their book Exploring Judaism: A Reconstructionist Approach: Expanded and Updated, Rebecca T. Alpert and Jacob J. Staub provide several sentences to describe Reconstructionist Jews.
Reconstructionist Jews are willing to question conventional answers and keep open minds. They believe that a Jew need not and ought not sacrifice intellectual integrity for the sake of his/her Jewish identity.
Reconstrcutionists are Jews who take the Jewish tradition seriously and live Jewish lives even though they don’t believe in the divine, supernatural origin of the Torah.
Reconstructionists believe that, just as Jewish civilization has adapted to new circumstances throughout Jewish history, so much it must adapt to North American society at the beginning of the twenty-first century.
Reconstructionists tend to conduct more intimate worship services in which everyone is involved, and the rabbi, in addition to leading, also encourages others to lead.
One of the ways that Reconstructionists tend to express their Jewish commitments is through social and political action. (p.xiv, Preface)
If you would are a Reconcstructionist Jew, Reconstructionist Christian, Reconstructional Buddhist, Reconstructionist Muslim, or Reconstructionist Agnostic please join us at Wedgewood Church.
John Wesley
Sadly, on May 2, 2012 United Methodists at their General Conference voted to maintain their denomination’s stance that homosexuals acts are “incompatible with Christian teaching.” Of course, the issue is not homosexual acts. The issue is whether or non-heterosexual sexual orientations are a sin.
An effort was made at the General Conference to at least acknowledge that Methodists differ about whether homosexuality is a sin. Rev. Maxie Dunnam, former president of Asbury Theological Seminary in Wilmore, Ky. Argued against such an effort, noting that Methodists” disagree on almost every issue we consider.”
Well, I can tell you some reasons you make the change. Methodist gay Christians have committed suicide because of church condemnation. This issue is the primary civil rights issue being discussed in the United States. You value the “United” part of “United Methodist” and you pass such a statement or you risk losing a large chunk of people. Finally, and most importantly, it’s a small step in the direction of being faithful.
Yes, Methodists do have cause for concern. ”United Methodism is shrinking in the U.S. and growing in Africa and Asia, shifting the balance of power to overseas conservatives. Nearly 40 percent of the delegates gathered in Tampa live outside the U.S.” (HuffingtonPost.com)
So here is a word of encouragement to Methodists. In my opinion, the best Biblical work on the Bible and sexual orientation has been done by a Methodist, Theodore W. Jennings, Jr. His three books are outstanding: Jacob’s Wound: Homoerotic narrative in the Literature of Ancient Israel, The Man Jesus Loved: Homoerotic Narratives From The New Testament, and Plato or Paul?: The Origins of Western Homophobia. The last one is more difficult than the first two, which are accessible to non-seminarians. Of course, with respect to Plato or Paul? I may just need to brush up on my Plato.
I hesitate to provide any quotes from the books because all three are must-reads. Don’t settle for quotes from them. But here are two quotes for distressed and disappointed Methodists:
“[T]his unnatural joining of Christianity and homophobia must be undone if Christianity is not to continue to be guilty of the true crime of Sodom: the violation of the vulnerable.” (Plato or Paul?: The Origins of Western Homophobia, p. 223)
“For years Ronna Case, to whom I have had the good fortune of being married for nearly thirty years, has exclaimed upon discovering some or another writing project upon which I am engaged, ‘Oh dear, we’ll have to pack!’ Of late she has been keeping an especially close eye on the luggage. Although I don’t plan on going anywhere, it has been my joy to play Ruth to her Naomi.” (The Man Jesus Loved: Homoerotic Narratives From The New Testament, Preface)
© 2011-2012 Liberal Baptist Rev All Rights Reserved -- Copyright notice by Blog Copyright